Home›Parties›Forward

Est. 2021 • Centrist / Reform

Anti-Federalist vs. Forward Party

The Forward Party, founded by Andrew Yang, correctly identifies that the two-party system is broken and that electoral reform is essential. They champion ranked-choice voting, open primaries, and independent redistricting. However, they deliberately avoid taking positions on substantive issues, believing that better process will produce better outcomes. Process without principle is just procedure.

Issue-by-Issue Breakdown

01

Electoral Reform

Forward Position

Ranked-choice voting. Open primaries. Independent redistricting commissions. These are their primary — and almost only — policy positions.

Anti-Federalist Position

We support all of these reforms AND have substantive positions on every major issue. Electoral reform is necessary but insufficient. You also need to know what you're fighting for.

Ranked-choice voting in Alaska did not produce better governance — it just produced different politicians. Process reform without ideological clarity produces centrist mush, not structural change.

02

Policy Substance

Forward Position

Deliberately avoid taking positions on healthcare, surveillance, corporate power, military spending, or any other major issue. Claim that "good process leads to good policy."

Anti-Federalist Position

You cannot reform a system if you refuse to name what is wrong with it. Corporate capture, mass surveillance, federal overreach — these are not process problems. They are power problems that require substantive positions.

The Forward Party is afraid of alienating potential supporters by taking positions. This is not courage — it is branding. A political party without positions is a marketing campaign.

03

Decentralization

Forward Position

No position on federal vs. local power. No position on the surveillance state. No position on corporate influence. No position on military spending.

Anti-Federalist Position

Radical decentralization. County-level governance. Abolish mass surveillance. Break corporate-state fusion. These are non-negotiable principles, not negotiation points.

The Forward Party would be comfortable with either a Democratic or Republican government as long as the process was "fair." We would not be comfortable with any government that concentrates power in Washington.

04

Coalition Building

Forward Position

Recruit disaffected Democrats and Republicans. Emphasize civility and bipartisanship. Avoid confrontation with established power structures.

Anti-Federalist Position

We are not interested in being civil to power structures that surveil, exploit, and control the American people. Civility is a tool the powerful use to prevent the powerless from demanding change.

The Forward Party wants everyone to get along. The Anti-Federalist Party wants to fundamentally restructure power in America. These are not compatible goals.

The Verdict

The Forward Party is a parking lot for politically homeless moderates who want change but don't want to fight for anything specific. Electoral reform without ideological substance is rearranging chairs on the Titanic. We share their diagnosis of the two-party problem but reject their prescription of procedural centrism.